TL;DR
The 50 day SPY long-call rule led six development variants, returning 52.68% versus SPY's 28.06% from 2022 through 2024, with 36.94% drawdown. Its pricing included synthetic spreads alongside real quotes. Later growth lagged SPY, and the reserved July through September 2026 test made no trades under the fixed premium budget. Contract selection, whole-contract sizing and exits mattered as much as the stock signal; each period started separately.
- Development strategy
- 52.68%
- SPY development
- 28.06%
- Reserved-test strategy
- 0.00%
- SPY reserved test
- 1.86%
A payoff example makes the trade-off concrete
For a simplified standard 100-share contract, a $500-strike call bought for $10 costs $1,000 before fees.
An options trading bot needs a contract rule, not just a stock signal
Being right about the direction of a stock is only part of an options strategy.
Choose the payoff before choosing the signal
Show the table · 5 rows, 3 columns
Scroll sideways to compare all columns. Select a heading to sort.
| Long call | Buy one call | Can the move overcome premium, time loss and trading costs? |
| Bull call spread | Buy a call; sell a higher-strike call | Is cheaper entry worth the capped payoff and short-leg lifecycle? |
| Covered call | Own shares; sell a call | Is the premium worth giving up gains above the strike? |
| Cash-secured put | Sell a put; reserve purchase cash | Can the account fund assignment and hold the acquired shares? |
| Credit spread or iron condor | Matched long and short legs | How are collateral, early assignment and exits handled? |
No matching rows. Clear the filter to see all records.
A long call buys upside exposure and can lose the premium paid.
The tested SPY options strategy
When SPY is above its 50-calendar-day native rolling mean and no matching long-call position exists, request a near-the-money call.
Show the table · 6 rows, 2 columns
| Setting | Selected version |
|---|---|
| Underlying and signal | SPY above 50-calendar-day native mean |
| Contract | Long near-the-money call; nearest eligible expiry in 30–45 days |
| Premium allocation | $1,000 budget; whole contracts; no matching position already open |
| Exit | Trend breaks or 14 days or fewer remain |
| Commission | $0.65 per contract per fill |
| Execution | Native option quote, spread/slippage and liquidity model |
No matching rows. Clear the filter to see all records.
Compare the variants before choosing a winner
Show the table · 6 rows, 4 columns
Scroll sideways to compare all columns. Select a heading to sort.
| Long call / 50-day | 52.68% | 36.94% | 47 |
| Long call / 100-day | 14.16% | 46.05% | 50 |
| Long call / 200-day | 21.73% | 49.97% | 41 |
| Bull call spread / 50-day | 33.73% | 30.01% | 108 |
| Bull call spread / 100-day | 7.86% | 40.09% | 114 |
| Bull call spread / 200-day | 36.17% | 32.39% | 86 |
No matching rows. Clear the filter to see all records.
2022–2024 development results. Returns include declared costs. The native closed-trade count measures asset trades or option legs: a two-leg spread contributes two closed legs. Selection used net return, with drawdown reported separately.
Test three trend windows for long calls, then the same three for bull call spreads.
The backtest that beat the baseline
- Strategy, costs included 2024-12-31, 21:00:00 UTC
- 15,267.62
- SPY buy and hold 2024-12-31, 21:00:00 UTC
- 12,806.5
The selected version ended at $15,267.62 from $10,000, a 52.68% cumulative return.
Audit the option lifecycle and the cash
The event replay reproduced the selected result and produced 94 filled orders across 47 closed call trades.
Quote coverage changes the meaning of the return
The development run recorded 110 real-quote pricings and 344 synthetic-spread pricings.
Freeze the rules, then test later dates
- Strategy, costs included 2026-09-30, 20:00:00 UTC
- 10,000
- SPY buy and hold 2026-09-30, 20:00:00 UTC
- 10,185.51
Each period is a separate $10,000 start. The candidate uses its $1,000 premium budget and option costs; SPY holding uses its recorded benchmark convention. The reserved strategy placed no trades.
Show the table · 3 rows, 4 columns
Scroll sideways to compare all columns. Select a heading to sort.
| 2022–2024 development | 52.68% | 28.06% | 36.94% |
| 2025–June 2026 follow-up | 7.73% | 28.47% | 16.34% |
| July–September 2026 reserved test | 0.00% | 1.86% | 0.00% |
No matching rows. Clear the filter to see all records.
Independent $10,000 starts. These returns must not be described as one continuously held account or averaged into an annual return.
The initial rules and repairs used January 2022 through December 2024.
Create this options trading bot in NexusTrade
Open Aurora with the filled-in request below.
Paper-test and deploy this options trading bot
After reviewing the rules and historical tests, prepare a separate paper portfolio from the saved draft.
What to take from the options comparison
The 50-day long-call version led the six-setting development comparison.
No comments yet.